
“We urge the Government to scrap these plans that are simply aimed at making Ireland a hostile place for migrants who contribute so much to our economy and society.”
Supporters
The people who came to the campaign, and the organisations against eight years for people already living here, each with its proof beside it.
Counted 20 October 2026.
“No rationale, research or evidence has been presented by the Department for these proposed changes, and no issues have been identified within the current system.”
7 September 2026
Said together, in public, against the eight years. Read the joint statement ↗

“We urge the Government to scrap these plans that are simply aimed at making Ireland a hostile place for migrants who contribute so much to our economy and society.”
“The eight year waiting period does not account for the substantial delays that already affect the current system.”
“No rationale, research or evidence has been presented by the Department for these proposed changes, and no issues have been identified within the current system.”

“Citizenship supports integration, belonging and participation.”
“Keeping people in an extended and uncertain status does not help integration.”

“The proposals will also prolong the political disenfranchisement of people who live, work, pay taxes and raise families here, but cannot vote in general elections or referendums.”

“Claims that these changes bring us in line with Europe do not ring true when many European countries maintain a five-year residence requirement.”
“As a team working with young people who will be directly impacted by the proposed changes to citizenship, we know the critical importance of belonging and having a sense of security for the future.”

“The proposals reported upon today, of a tightening of citizenship rules, are another performative hostility designed to appeal to and stoke anti-immigrant and racist sentiment.”

“Adding an additional three years to the time needed to gain citizenship will add extra costs, barriers and stress.”

“The Bar Council proposes that provision should be made for a transitional period for those who have already accrued residency rights, or residency periods, as well as for those who have applications being considered at present.”
On record: they said it in their own words, in public, and the link is where. They have not signed up to the campaign.
Is yours with us?
A group, a union, a society, a club or a business. Put your organisation’s name to it: we check every one with whoever sends it before it goes up here. The TDs and Senators against it are on where TDs stand.
Add your organisation